GROWATT 200W Portable Solar Panel for Power Station, 24V Foldable Solar Charger with Adjustable Kickstands, Universal Connector, Water & Dustproof for Outdoor Camping RV Off Grid System

My application is for a EF Delta 2. Box arrived undamaged, easy setup. Providing its real-world wattage with full sun.Location is Indiana at 6PM in July facing east.Pros:Easy setup, plug and play, no gimmicky on board phone charger, just a panel with MC4 leads.Good build quality.Outputs reasonable-accurate real-world power levels.Possible Con(s):-(Long) I feel like I may break it trying to unfold it?. It's a 'rigid' material, which is good, but it does making slight crackling sounds if you put enough pressure when trying to set it up. Like holding it and leaning the panel back to setup legs, I had to press to hold it and with thumbs on front, sort-of like a bending direction to keep it from falling forward. I made sure to hold the very edge, avoiding the actual solar cells. I THINK it's just the material used and it will be okay.- It's heavier than I expected, but if it's durable, that's fine.Conlusion:First day I'm happy with my purchase. It was a little higher on my ideal budget for a portable panel, but better value for 200w vs $450 for ecoflow 160w.

UPDATE 4/22/23Upgraded to 4 stars. Right after publishing the original review, we had a nice sunny day that allowed for comparing the Growatt to a more efficient panel (for its active solar area based on STC standard test conditions) mentioned in the review . The Growatt pushed out 145 watts where the "more efficient" panel was producing only 122 watts under the same conditions. The difference seemed to be related to the temperature of the solar cells. The Growatt was running 10 to 15 degrees cooler in all 4 panels compared to the competitive panel. I don't know why that would be.STC pegs the temperature of the panel under test at 77F (25C) and the panel temps today varied between 115 degrees to 122 in any of the 4 panels in the Growatt. The "more efficient" panel was running 10 to 15 degrees above that. Can't be sure that was the reason, but the watts being produced tells the story.So there you have it. Panel specs based on STC should be taken with a grain of salt maybe? What matters is what happens in the real operating conditions and makes these comparisons important. In spite of some of the negatives mentioned about the Growatt, I think this power difference is worth the upgrade.========================================================================Lick your fingers for grip, no grab handle when the panel is out of the case.Wide and sturdy kickstands, ETFE construction with oxford fabric backing with no handles on the panel (only handles on carrying case). Panel edges are sharp and with the oxford cloth backing can work like a saw against skin. Cut skin on a knuckle which was kind of a nuisance because it bugged me for a few days. I have 2 other 200w foldables and never ran across that because the panels have integrated handles.MC4 connectivity only. Wires are tie wrapped so that they don't dangle loosely. I liked that idea and will leave them that way.The carrying case is a curious item. it has no pocket our pouch for extra adapters. One side of the case has a rigid reinforcement while the other side flops loosely, so it will stand up with no panel in it. The panel seems heavy and is a little cumbersome to handle out of its pouch. Set up it is sturdy, but with only 3 kickstands for 4 panels, but looks like something is "missing"!For its active solar area, its power output is slightly lower than 2 other brands of this type of foldable panel based on manufacturer's Volts @ Pmax and Amps @@ Pmax. Keep in mind that power is measured under standard test conditions (STC) and the power produced is what is spec'd. The other 2 panels produced 199.98 and 198 watts with the Growatt 200 coming in at 189.62.Power figures in watts per sq in of active solar area are 0.125, .122 and .118 (Growatt 200), with a total active area in sq inches of 1594.91, 1624.42 and 1609.88 (Growatt). So the Growatt 200 produced less power per sq in and is slightly less efficient. An after the fact review of efficiency ratings showed the Growatt has an asserted efficiency rate of 22%. Of the other 2, one claims 23.5% and the other 23%). Interestingly again, the 1594.9 (smallest active area) produced more power per sq in. If you guessed that's the one at 23.5% efficiency, you'd be right.Didn't have chance to do a comparison under good solar conditions. The STCs tell the story for now.On the plus side--the MC4 that are stowed and an easy connection.--solid ETFE construction with oxford fabric backing--protected zipper--easy MC4 release/disconnect compared to typical barbed connectors.--Magnetically secured kickstands provide easy release compared to velcroOn the down side,--no other included connectivity (but that's no surprise as listing mentions ONLY MC4)--sharp edges can cut with saw like action linked to--only the carrying case with a grip.--carrying case has no pouch or pockets for extra cables/manual--less efficientIn summary, less efficiency, at $349 a higher price, harder to handle with sharp edges, this one is teetering on the border between a high 3 or low 4. More to follow after comparison testing under better solar conditions.

Panel provides great way to replenish batteries while boondocking without shore power. Even cloudy days yield decent amount of power. Folds into nice size and bag to place in truck camper closet. Just plan out all your connections and cabling so you end up with a good system overall and, of course, a good control module.

This product does not produce the proper amount of watts with solar. I can’t get more than 140w in direct light. You would need 4 of these panels min to just recharge in one day at this input. At 350$ each it’s just ridiculous. Also the panels do not fold out very easily. They are almost impossible to lay out flat when you first take them out. The stand also broke on one panel after first use. One panel didn’t have a stand at all. So I have invested over 1300$ on this system so far and it still won’t work as advertised. I would have to spend another 1100$ in panels but the quality isn’t worth it. The power bank itself is kind of handy but for the price a person could buy a battery, inverter, and panel and get similar results if not better for cheaper.

Well made, easy to assemble, portable.

I purchased this to charge my portable electric generator. My power had dropped below 50% so I set it up in my driveway to charge with in a matter of hours I was back to 100% charged. I’m looking at purchasing a larger capacity generator to power additional appliances in my home as well as my campsite.

Clear skys, 90 degree orientation, 8000ft above sea level, full sun…. The max I can get is 160W.I emailed the company to ask if this is normal and did not get a response. I like the portability, but need 200W… as advertised. Buy accordingly.

Like that is is made so well and works great