8927

I couldn't be more pleased with the Invicta Pro Diver model 9094. Mine shipped with no blemishes or imperfections. The watch came in the official yellow Invicta box with the yellow plastic Invicta name tag wrapped around the bracelet. The watch face, back, and band were covered in protective film. For the last 10 years I have been wearing an Invicta Pro Diver model 9937. I loved the 9937 but moisture got inside and fogged the crystal about a month ago. I tried a couple things like drying it with a hair dryer and even removing the back and reapplying silicone grease to the gasket, but no luck. I planned to buy another 9937. I wanted to stick with a stainless band automatic dive watch with a see-through back case. The 9937 is the same price it was 10 years ago and is a great value at less than $250 for a Swiss SW200-1 movement. The current 9937 is essentially the same as the one I bought in 2013, but with one change: The "SWISS MVMT" marking at the bottom of the face is no longer there. :( The 9937 still has the "SWISS MOVEMENT" marking engraved on the case back, but the marking removed from the face is a disappointment to me. It's a minor detail, but I know it would bug me every time I looked at the watch. While I was deciding whether to buy a new 9937 anyway, my daughter got a Tissot Seastar 1000 36mm. The Tissot is a Swiss made dive watch with a similar style to the Invicta Pro Diver. It's hundreds of dollars more than the Invicta Pro Diver watches and is very high quality, though it has a quartz movement. Her Tissot has a blue face and bezel and is very attractive and I liked the look. I wasn't sure if I would tire of the blue face and bezel over time but decided to give the Invicta 9094 a try since it was only $72. Wow, I am impressed! In direct sunlight, the face has an iridescent deep blue shimmer that changes depending on the viewing angle. The bezel is a slightly lighter shade of blue in the sunlight. Out of direct sunlight, the color difference between the face and bezel is more noticeable, with the face being a dark blue and the bezel a light blue. Looks great either way, but if you want to show it off, it's amazing in direct sunlight. The blue is a bit "blingy" compared to the black watch I replaced but I love it so far. Appearance-wise, the 9094 is almost identical to my 9937. Same size, face, hands, and markings. The bracelets are both solid-link oyster-style with brushed outer finish and shiny center finish, but the 9937 has thicker links - 4mm vs. 3.5mm. I weighed both watches and the 9937 is 145 grams compared to 139 for the 9094. I assume most of that is due to the heftier band on the 9937. The 9094 feels just as substantial as the 9937 on my wrist. I was skeptical going from the Swiss SW200-1 movement to the Japanese Seiko NH35A movement. Out of the box, my 9937 was slow by about 12 sec/day. It stayed like that for a few months. I unscrewed the back and adjusted it and got it to about 6 sec/day slow. In comparison, the 9094 has been running about 3.5 sec/day fast out of the box. I'm shocked it's that good. It took 17 days before it was 1 minute fast. At $72, this was more a temporary experiment (to see if I liked the blue face/bezel as opposed to black) than a permanent replacement for the 9937, but for now I'm in no rush to get anything else. The 9937 did have that "Flame Fusion" crystal which remained scratch-free for 10 years despite being somewhat of a beater watch. Time will tell if the mineral crystal on the 9094 will remain scratch-free as well. Bottom line, I don't know how Invicta can make such a quality automatic watch at this price.

Beautiful watch! The design looks premium and elegant, and the automatic movement works perfectly. Feels solid on the wrist and keeps accurate time. Great value for the price—definitely a standout piece!

I purchased this watch after seeing it online on Amazon and thought it looked very similar to the Rolex Submariner. For less that $100, I thought "Why not? If it's junk I can return it or keep it as a thrasher watch." Well, I was very surprised. The 8926 is a sharp looking watch! It's heavy, solidly built with thick solid bracelet and clean very Rolex-like dial. This version has the Japanese automatic movement from Seiko, movement NH25A (my watch is engraved 8926A on the back case). The auto-wind rotor is etched with SII and Seiko "dot" logo on the right side and NH25A on the left side along with "twenty one jewels" on the center. There are other miscellaneous engravings on the rotor. I own several automatic watches that I can wind manually by turning the crown. When I tried to wind this watch manually, it didn't do anything. I didn't feel it engage the mainspring... the crown just spun freely. A look through the manual didn't mention anything about the Seiko NH25A movement so I thought perhaps the watch was defective because the crown wouldn't engage the mainspring for manual winding. I decided to check the SII website, specifically the NH25A specification and discovered that this movement doesn't have manual winding capability. It's 100% automatic and must be wound by movement of the rotor. I wonder how many people returned this watch thinking it was defective! Anyway, I put the watch in a watch winder and let it go for 24 hours (timed auto rotation mode)and it's been running flawlessly since. I read how some owners were disappointed that their 8926 reserve time is less than 8 hours. I let mine wind down to see how long the reserve time is and it went a full 36 hours before it stopped. I put it back in the watch winder and let it fully wind up and it's been running non-stop for over a month as a daily wearer. I take the watch off at night and let it sit for 8 to 10 hours per day and it hasn't stopped once. I've pretty much stopped wearing my other watches (I have 45 of them). My 8926A has been running very accurately. In little over month and half, I've only reset the time twice my moving the minute hand back 2 minutes each time. Either I got very lucky with this movement's regulation or Seiko NH25A is an excellent movement! I like my Invicta 8926A so much and have been so impressed with Invicta quality, I went and bought more. I now have the following... 8926 Japan Automatic S/S (stainless steel) scalloped edge bezel 9307 Swiss Quarts S/S scalloped edge bezel 9310 Swiss Quartz S/S Gold scalloped edge bezel 9937 Swiss Automatic S/S coin-edge bezel (aka Rolex style) 9938 Swiss Automatic S/S Gold coin-edge bezel (aka Rolex style) All of them are running flawlessly. UPDATE: 9/23/13 My Invicta 8926 has been running non-stop and flawlessly since I bought it over a year ago. During that time, I let it wind down only three times just to see what the reserve time is and it's right around 30 - 35 hours. When I'm not wearing the watch, it's in an auto-winder. I don't like getting my watches wet because I hate the wet clammy feeling under the watch on my wrist and I have to take the watch off anyway to dry it, so I generally won't soak the watch to begin with, especially if it has leather band. Having read the customers review that complained about the water resistance of their Invicta watches, I decided to soak mine... in the shower and in a cup of water overnight. No damage visible and watch keeps perfect time. Maybe I'm lucky? Now, that was before I opened the case back to regulate the watch. The gasket still looked good when I put the case back back on but as for its water tightness now, I don't know and I don't care because I'm not going to soak it diving down to 660 feet. The watch crystal, bezel, case and most of the links still look very shiny and in excellent condition except for the clasp which is completely scratched up from being dragged across desks. It's taken few very hard hits and hasn't suffered any shock damage. Overall, I was so pleased with my Invicta, I bought many more instead of dropping a lot of money on one Swiss-Made brand name watch... I researched a lot about the Swiss watch industry and now I refuse to fall for the marketing scam. I work with several people who are watch snobs and they pretty much laugh at the Invicta brand or any thing else that doesn't cost upwards of $5000 and up. Can someone tell me why Breitling, Tag Heuer, Tissot and Rolex cost so much, especially if its just stainless steel and not precious metal case?? Just a bit of rambling now. Over the past year, I've sort of lost my mind and became a watch fanatic... I now own about 300 watches and the last tally on purchases surpassed $10,000. I became fascinated with the whole watch industry and watchmaking/repairs and decided to study Horology as a hobby. For one, the whole Swiss Made quality thing is a marketing scam. I delved into the whole manufacturing/marketing thing and learned that really there is only a handful of movement manufacturers in Switzerland (Swatch Group being one of the largest {ETA movements}) that supply most of the movements to other manufacturers. Some of the EXPENSIVE name brand watches use "upgraded" movement parts that you'd find in lower priced watches. I can understand the "upgrading" of the parts but how do they justify the incredible cost? It's all in the name. I bet you'll be surprised to learn that a lot of Swiss watches are made with parts supplied by companies outside of Switzerland and "finished" in Switzerland. As long as it's 50% cost of assembly of the movement in Switzerland, it's considered Swiss Movement. It doesn't matter where the parts came from (China). Now, of course there are some Swiss watch manufacturers that make everything in-house and don't share anything, but it's only a handful. So, with this dose of skepticism, I bought many watches to test and evaluate, priced from about $15.00 to over $1000.00. I also bought a timing machine and various watchmaker tools and gained enough knowledge to be able to take apart and repair mechanical watches (as well as quartz watches.) Sapphire crystal is the rage on watches... so I decided to replace quite a few of them on my personally owned watches... and discovered that they aren't that expensive at all. In Los Angeles Jewelry District, I bought many genuine sapphire crystals from dealers that supply watch parts to repair shops for about $10.00 to $35.00 per piece depending on size and thickness, most of them being in the $10 - $15 mark. It takes me less than 5 minutes to swap out the mineral glass with the sapphire glass. I also buy watch batteries for about 50 cents per piece instead of $4.00 to $5.00 per piece you'd find at repair shops. Shows you what kind of profit they are making... Using my timing machine, I have regulated my mechanical watches to accuracy within +/-5 seconds or better per day. My Invicta 8926 with the NH25A Seiko movement has been regulated to within +/-2 seconds per day. It took me about 30 minutes of measuring and adjusting the balance to get this accurate and it was done measuring the timing with dial up, dial down, 12H up, 12H down, 3H up (crown up), 3H down, averaging positional error. The watch also has 0.1 mSec beat timing error or better depending on positioning, which is good. It means the tick and the tock of the watch is timed almost perfectly. I could have paid thousands of dollars for ONE watch bearing famous Swiss name to get this type of accuracy, but then, I would have learned that I was ripped off just for the bragging rights to say "I own a (insert expensive name watch here)." I even bought a tourbillon watch to test it for timing accuracy and... surprise... it's no more accurate than my other $100 - $500 watches. Now, I will admit that some of my mechanical watches were very very difficult to regulate because they just wouldn't hold adjustment. But it was more of an exception than the rule. Those watches I use to practice taking apart and reassembly... and I have broken a few of them. Quartz watches, in general, are very accurate. I've been timing them using timing signal from Fort Collins, Colorado for accuracy and from my no-name $15 quartz watch to my Philips Watch (Swiss Made)and my Movados (and all in-between from Chinese, Japanese and Swiss)have all been within 5 seconds per month or better with an exception of a few that have been off my almost 8 to 10 seconds per month. In other words, in a year, the worse timed quartz watch will be off by 2 minutes. I can live with that. Oh, and I'm still adding to my watch collection. Yes, I have lost my mind... :)

This review is for the Invicta Men's 8926 Pro Diver Automatic watch I recently purchased. The first watch I received had a defect and Amazon customer service was great, they replaced the watch immediately. The replacement was just as beautiful as the first one was that was defective. This watch appears to be of very high quality, not only does it look great, it feels great while wearing it. The adjustment to the watch band was very easy and now the watch fits perfectly and is comfortable to wear all day long. The watch gains about 6-8 minutes a day, which is not too bad, better than losing time each day, although I expected it to be more accurate than that. I have read many reviews from others who bought this same watch and some reported issues with accuracy, some even worse than my watch but those who had them adjusted all reported that the watch could be adjusted to keep better time, about +/- 3-4 seconds each day, which is very good for an inexpensive automatic watch. The only real complaint I have is that the stored energy from just the movement of my arm all day at my office job is insufficient to keep the watch running for more that about 12 hours after I take it off. I read some reviews where others reported the stored energy for their Invicta automatic watches was also inadequate. However, if I had a more active job, I think the energy in the watch would keep it running for longer, maybe 16-18 hours or so, and that is based on some experimenting I performed by moving the watch around for 2-3 minutes after I take the watch off at the end of the day. The only other automatic watch I have owned would store energy better as it would stay running for more than 40 hours, about double the energy this watch stores, without having to do anything other than wear the watch all day. Altogether, I am very happy with my Invicta watch and if it would just store a bit more energy, I would rate it outstanding. For the price you will pay for this watch, I don't think you could find one that looks as nice or works any better. Below are my further comments about 2 weeks after my first comments were provided: This is just an update about the accuracy of this watch. I mistakenly stated that this watch gains about 6-8 minutes a day. I meant to say that it gains about 6-8 seconds a day. I apologize for the mistake. I have done some reading since my first post and learned that these mechanical watches have a break-in period and after that, they usually will keep better time, although I have no idea how long the break-in period is. I also want to state that if I take the time to move the watch around and around for about a minute each day after I take it off, it will still be running the next day, at least to noon time. So, I guess my desk job does not provide enough movement to keep it fully wound up, so that explains why it will stop running in the early morning if I just take it off and put it on my nightstand each afternoon. I would definitely buy this same watch again based on the performance and looks and for the very reasonable price. I have raised my rating from three stars to four stars.

4/25/23: Update 3 Even though I said I was done updating this review, I felt I needed to do just one more… I’ve had this watch for around 2.5 years and it still runs like a champ. I don’t wear it that much anymore, so I give it a wind here and there to keep things moving; having zero problems starting back up. The watch has a decent amount of scratches in the case and the bezel insert lume has slightly deteriorated over time. In late 2021, I wanted to do something special. I swapped the dial, handset, crystal, and strap out for some high quality aftermarket ones. And sheesh, it looks and feels a thousand times better!! Only grievance I had was with trying to install the seconds hand which I accidentally broke… it’s kind of difficult to do Anyway this watch looks so much better than it had before and still functions like new. The automatic pro diver’s are an incredible platform to work on, especially if you wanted to get into watch modding. Very, very easy to work on. 10/4/20: (Main Review) Recently purchased this watch and had been anticipating its arrival. It is absolutely gorgeous and is everything I had been wanting in a watch. The two-tone bezel, exhibition case back, screw-down crown, 200 meters of WR, and low price; what’s not to love? Well with the first one that I ordered, the crown was quite difficult to pull in and out and to screw back in. I was not pleased with this and was very disappointed with it. Thankfully, Amazon took my request for a replacement and I have to say that it is a much better improvement. In general, the threading in these watches aren’t the smoothest to begin with, but it shouldn’t feel like metal on metal (I’m pretty sure my first one was refurbished). I’ve heard somewhere that a quick fix regarding this issue would be to apply silicone grease to the threads. Another con about this watch was the lume. It’s not great since it doesn’t last long and isn’t even bright enough when fully charged for any real usage while submerged under water. Delivery was rather quick (early in fact), as it had been shipped and sold via Amazon. I definitely recommend this watch as a solid first automatic timepiece and/or diver. Before I finish, I want to discuss this watch’s movement: each new Pro Diver has Seiko’s NH35 automatic movement which is said to be highly accurate. Some people complain about its accuracy but I don’t know what to expect and will find out for myself. Thank you for reading and I hope you find this review helpful! UPDATE #1: 11/19/20: Having owned this watch for a little over a month now, I have to say I am EXTREMELY pleased with it. I have received quite a few compliments while wearing this watch and it just feels awesome to wear. Some people give the Pro Diver lineup a bad wrap for being a Submariner homage and for its supposed lack of water resistance. Well hear this: most people won’t even care if you’re wearing a Submariner homage or the real thing. Yeah the Rolex is obviously impressive and better; but this is a way to have a Submariner without buying one for thousands of dollars. This watch just happens to be the best of the homages (in my opinion). Anyway, the water resistance is no worry for me. As long as you remember to screw the crown back in after setting the time/date, it’ll be fine. Mine has survived numerous times after being submerged in hot water. To conclude this update, I want to say to you that this watch is a must-have. Yeah it might not be the best watch out there but know that it has most of the same specs and similar build quality as dive watches worth $100 more than it. I love mine and so will you — if make the right decision and buy one! UPDATE #2: 2/16/21 Still a daily wearer! I have so many other watches in my collection but I need to say that this one gets most time on the wrist. I’ve acquired noticeable scratches on the polished parts of the case from normal wear and tear, but that’s to be expected. I’ve held off on talking about the movement’s accuracy so it could pass the break-in period. It keeps really good time. Mine’s running an average of between +/- 5 to 10 seconds a day. It varies for me regarding how much I wear it. I’m raising the stars up to 5/5 from 4/5 because I love the watch so so much. But wow do I really hate scalloped bezels! (Not the watch’s fault per se). Looks like this will be my last update for this watch. Cannot recommend it enough. Thanks for reading!

October 2014, 19 month update. Quite honestly I haven’t a clue regarding the accuracy of this watch movement. The following paragraph are previous accuracy reports which consistently recorded negative losses in time. After several months off wrist in a drawer but with daily crown (stem) winding the accuracy continued to diminish up to a loss of 40 seconds a day which was unacceptable to my standards. After these several months off wrist I started wearing the watch again and much to my surprise the watch actually started gaining time for the first time. This was with winding the movement with gentle not vigorous side to side (off wrist) rocking movement about 5 to 10 minutes a day. With this style of winding, the accuracy has increased to within about 5 seconds a day, usually fast. Note when taken off wrist for sleep at night the watch typically loses about 5 seconds a night. But when wound as previously described it gains back that 5 seconds during the day and is closely dead accurate every 24 hours. Why and how this happened after a year and a half and after about 3 months off wrist with manual crown winding is quite the mystery to me. Right now it far exceeds the Seiko manufacturers specifications of accuracy for this NH35A movement. Currently I’m stunned that this watch is presently more accurate than my Seiko SKX007 and even my Rolex Submariner! It’s only a couple of seconds less accurate than my solar electronic watches which have quartz movements. July 2024 accuracy update. 16 months after purchase. Loses -27 to - 28 seconds per day. Seiko, the maker of the movement says its accuracy is +45 to -35 seconds per day. Other literature says this movement NH35A is accurate to -20 to +40 seconds a day. So mine is within factory specs. My personal preference is a watch that gains time rather than loses time. I think it is unrealistic to expect a more accurate automatic mechanical watch for the price of $80.00. As such I consider it to be an acceptable value. January 19, 2024 update: ten month progress report Originally purchased March 11, 2023, initial impressions: Great care was taken in packaging of the watch. There are extensive protective coatings and films to protect the new watch to insure its arrival in perfect condition. All moving parts of the watch appear to be tight as a drum with is no play, slack or slop in the adjustment stem (aka crown). The bezel and all moving parts including bracelet are tight and secure. There is a very specific heft to the watch indicating solid stainless steel as opposed to cheap pot metals. Every aspect indicates care given a quality product. Rather than other imitation Rolex Submariner knock offs, Invicta proudly inscribes their brand name on the side of the watch which is openly visible, indicating their pride of product. Note that despite the label “Professional Divers” the bracelet lacks a built in wetsuit extension adjustment. The overall quality is very impressive. (Note that despite the label “Professional Divers” the bracelet lacks a built in wetsuit extension adjustment.) The mechanical movement of this watch is the Seiko manufactured NH35A. Seiko states the accuracy of this movement is +45 to -35 seconds a day. 5 independent websites (Relojee, The Watch Blog, Lucius Alelier, Grayson, and Chronometer Check) report the accuracy of this movement to be +40 to -20 seconds per day. Trade literature indicates the industry standard is + or - 25 seconds a day as typical and acceptable for an automatic mechanical watch. The following is an accuracy report that I’ve actually experienced with this watch. I recommend supplemental winding if the wearer is either sedentary or spends a large portion of their time seated in front of a computer screen. I recommend winding by the physical movement of the watch rather than winding the crown (stem). After 10 months of experimentation, I have found the best way to supplementally wind the watch to attain the greatest accuracy, is the following method/technique: With your forearm resting on the arm of a chair and the watch in hand, gently roll the wrist/forearm in an arch slowly—at the rate of about a cycle a second for a few minutes. Using this method my watch had been accurate to between -3 and -6 seconds per day. Previously with vigorous agitation the accuracy was around -17 to -19 seconds a day. Really vigorous agitation slowed the movement to -30 to -40 seconds a day. Wind it slowly and gently to maintaining greatest accuracy. As a point of reference, an official Swiss COSC certification of chronometer is -4 to +6 seconds per day. Only 3% of watches made in Switzerland meet this standard. COSC only certifies Swiss watches. To put this in further perspective, look up the official Seiko website SEIKOWATCHES.COM and read the proud announcement of the new model PROSPEX SPB 297 the divers modern reinterpretation SAVE THE OCEAN SPECIAL EDITION, caliber (movement) 6R35 which has an accuracy of +25 to -15 seconds per day. This PROSPEX watch is priced at $1,250.00. THE BOTTOM LINE: all in all, given its overall quality and its acceptible accuracy, qualifies it as an exceptional value . (A possible comparison may be the Seiko 5 series which uses the same movement and are significantly more expensive-approximately twice the cost. Check the other evaluations for their accuracy reports. My watrch loses about one minute every 3 days, or about 2 minutes each week. You can decide if you can live with this accuracy. Note that solar watches do not require routine battery replacements and have the accuracy of typical quartz movements i.e. a couple of seconds per day. Citizen and Seiko solar dive watches typically cost in excess of $300.00.

I only just received my watch so this is a first impressions review. I'll update in intervals to give a better idea of performance, wearability, etc. The watch itself is built sturdy, and comes in a very nice yellow suede lined box. Very nice looking. I have shied away from Invictas in the past because they seem so large on the wrist. I'm ok with large watches, I own 26 watches now, but don't like oversized ones. The band is solid stainless and was easy to remove links to adjust. I only mention that because I have run across newer bands that use a different system of pins holding the links together. Did I mention how nice the watch looks? A lot of watch collectors have apparently had issues with Invicta's customer service. I can't speak to that as I said I received it only today and it appefars to be in good working order and I am so far very satisfied. I'll give it a month or so of wearing before I can comment on performance. I set it to the second by the NIST official time sire so it will be interesting to see any time variances in the coming months. So far I will say that I highly recommend it and look forward to adding it to my collection. Maybe this will open up the Invictas for me. I have my eye on the 8928OB Pro Diver. Update: A previous reviewer gave this watch two stars because of a perceived defect. The crown was 'Frozen' and he could not turn it to set the watch. As a result he sent it back. When I got my watch the crown was frozen too. I too was at first dismayed but as it turns out that's how it comes. The crown in a stowed position and just needs to be carefully popped out. I've only had my watch for a few days but I think I can now speak to its accuracy. It has an automatic movement so relies on a system of wound springs and gears to provide power to drive the movement. When I first got it I pretty much left it up to the natural motion of my hand to wind it. Result, after the first night's sleep it had lost nearly a full minute. Just on a whim I tried deliberately winding or shaking my wrist for a few seconds thruout the day. The next morning when I checked the NIST site the watch was now a whole minute ahead. So how much you move or wind your watch has a definite effect on its accuracy. An automatic like this one will never compare to a Quartz movement for accuracy, but if you want a timepiece that with a bit of care and maintenance every couple of years will be passed on to the next generation and possibly beyond, this is the watch for you. For a watch that's like a piece of art with its hundreds of tiny mechanical pieces moving together you can either see a little inaccuracy as a flaw or a mark of its charm. Buy the way, it was pretty much an obvious thing but I only saw it after reading about the movement types. On a wind up or automatic watch the second hand moves in a sweeping or smooth motion ticking multiple times a second around the dial. A Quartz watch's second hand only ticks once a second hence the pronounced 'stuttering' movement.

Frankly, I was somewhat skeptical. A decent, let alone good, watch at this price from ... ahem ... Invicta? Well, my experience 2 weeks or so into ownership has pretty much proven my suspicions to be ill-founded. This is a terrific watch, made all the better because of the "silly" price. Pay 20x the money or much more, if you want, in terms of a quality watch, you won't do better. OK, it doesn't say Omega or Rolex on the dial. But, let me take you through my likes and dislikes. 1. Appearance. It looks terrific straight out of the case and appears to be well made. On my wrist, I think it looks great -- it's 40mm, ie, medium sized these days, and that suits me. 2. Feel. It has a surprising heft. I wasn't expecting this for a watch at this price-point, but it feels substantial, but not overly heavy, when wearing it. I like that very much -- it's reassuring, somehow, and suggests robustness and superior build quality to my way of thinking. 3. Durability. Too soon to tell, overall, However, when I accidentally banged the watch against a heavy metal gate the other day, I winced, fully expecting to find at least a cracked or scratched crystal, or damage to the strap. Nope. Nada. I wasn't just relieved, I was, again, very pleasantly surprised by this piece. 4. Reliability. Again, probably too early to say, overall. Again, however, I will say this: my watch has been keeping perfect time. Saying so here will now probably jinx it, but we shall see. I was not expecting this from my own prior experience with an automatic watch, and some of the other reviews here. It wouldn't have bothered me too much, as I viewed time gain/loss as part of the automatic watch experience -- and I like to engage with my devices. Sort of like preferring to drive stick over automatic. It's a personal thing. But, so far, this watch has kept perfect time. 5. Automatic movement. I just prefer it to quartz, although quartz is, typically, just perfectly accurate. I didn't want to see the word "quartz" on the dial, and I liked seeing the watch-movement on the back of the case. That movement, however, is painted yellow, not left stainless. Initially, I was put off by this because I just didn't like the aesthetic. However, I almost never see it as the watch is on my wrist all the time, and now I've become used to it anyway. 6. Service. This also really surprised me. I took delivery of the watch and followed the instructions (or so I thought) to set both the time and the date. Problem: time re-set ok, but not the date, no matter how often I tried. I was disappointed and annoyed with myself. After all, at this price-point, what could I expect? So, I waited 24 hours and was advised I could either get a complete refund or a replacement. If io ted for the replacement, i would have 30 days to return the original, or else my card would be charged again. I opted for the replacement, which arrived a few days later. Again, I was unable to set the date, although the setting the time went flawlessly. Again I was frustrated, but also skeptical of the possibility that not one but two watches had the identical issue. Perhaps the problem wasn't with the watch, but with me -- perhaps I was doing something wrong? I took them to a nearby jeweler/Invicta dealer, who showed me that, yes indeed, the problem was me. When setting the date, even though you are going forward, you have to wind backwards, ie, counter-clockwise. Problem solved! I therefore returned the replacement watch and kept the original. Yes, the instructions in the box could have been clearer, but I was mightily impressed by the Seller (Amazon?) immediately sending me a replacement with no questions asked, and then giving me 30 days to return the original before charging my card. 7. The"unboxing" experience. People post YouTube videos of themselves unboxing their latest doo-dad all the time. Certainly, there is something satisfying about unboxing your new iProduct or Cartier that adds to the whole ownership experience. This, for me, was not that. The box is a horrible vinyl. The yellow color isn't exactly subtle, but would probably look better in cardboard. I don't keep it out anywhere visible. The instructions are stuffed into the lid and don't fit. It all looks and feels wrong. The watch itself was covered in a number of transparent protective tapes, that were tricky to remove and required some patience. All that said, none of these (minor) gripes have affected my overall, very positive experience. 8. Value For Money. You could get yourself the quartz version for about $30 cheaper at the time of writing. While that's not nothing, and is about a full one-third less than this watch, I opted for this model. The quartz model also has a slightly different bezel, one which I actually prefer as it's a little more modern and subtle, without the classic, jagged "teeth." This watch has the traditional look. However, for me, an automatic stainless-steel diver's watch with these looks, heft and reliability at this price, represents excellent VFM. 9.Conclusion. If you're considering this watch, I say buy it. It's very reasonably priced for what it is and you'll have ample time to return it if you don't like it.

Ótima construção e acabamento, além de possuir uma ótima máquina automática.

Puedo recomendar ampliamente este reloj invicta, es un diver profesional, automático con maquinaría Seiko y con una excelente acabado. A continuación describiré los pros y contras que pude identificar después de unas semanas de uso: Pros: Tiene unos acabados excelentes, y hablo en general. Es más bonito en físico, ya que solo de esta manera puedes apreciar bien los colores. Tiene una excelente máquina Seiko que cuenta con parada de segundero y cuerda manual. Cuenta con ventana de exhibición para poder ver el corazón del reloj. El extensible es excelente. Tiene corona y tapa trasera roscables. Tiene ajuste rápido de fecha. Contras: Si no lo usas al menos cada dos días tendrás que acomodar la hora y fecha. El bisel es un poco duro, se puede utilizar sin problemas pero no se compara al de un Casio Marlin. El broche es un poco difícil de abrir ya que es de presión. En conclusión recomiendo totalmente este reloj, por el precio no encontrarás algo que se le compare, recomiendo comprarlo cuando el precio ronde los 2,300 pero creo que incluso por 2,800 vale la pena. Nota: si lo que buscas es solo un diver aunque no tenga bisel Pepsi, hay opciones de invicta más económicas con la misma calidad.

Over the years, Invicta has gained notoriety for its endless homages of classic timepieces by other watchmakers. The brand is viewed by some watch enthusiasts as unoriginal, tacky, and deceiving. However, still, Invicta is a good starting point for those looking into getting a genuine automatic watch. The Invicta Pro Diver (8926ob) is an excellent homage of the Rolex Submariner in my opinion, and here’s why: First, the quality of the timepiece. The stainless steel casing and bracelet are of outstanding quality. The bracelet feels solid, and the housing has some weight to it. At this price, you’d expect a kiosk-tier Rolex knockoff; This watch doesn’t feel like the manufacturers cut corners on its materials. The glass used is a proprietary mineral material, and so far, it has been great with zero scratches. The crown is great, despite what other reviewers have said. I haven’t had any issues with turning the crown and enjoy the satisfying feel of winding it. The watch uses a Seiko-calibre NH35A movement, which is insanely durable. The movement on its own sells for about half of this watch’s retail price and is widely available on secondary markets. This means that if you ever have an issue with the watch, you can source its movement online with no trouble. The hacking and hand-winding features are exceptional, and I found that it keeps time very well. After a day of wear, the watch fell behind only by 1 second. Wow. As for its design, of course, many love it, and others hate it. It looks much like a Rolex Submariner. I don’t care if it looks very much like a Rolex, nor do I care to listen to watch snobs when they stare at it with disgust. Rolex or Invicta, this style is beautiful. I love the Mercedes hand and find the bezel to be decent. There are no complaints in terms of design. Now, let’s talk about the lume on the dials and bezel. It’s almost non-existent. At night, it’s virtually impossible to see the lume even if you had the watch under the sun all day. It was very disappointing, but for this price, it is expected. Overall, it’s a beautiful watch comprised of well-sourced materials and the Seiko-calibre movement. The movement is the star of the show for this watch, giving it excellent value and functionality. The stainless steel and mineral glass are durable, but lume, non-existent. The bracelet is perfect and feels solid and feels comfortable for all-day use. For its price, it’s a no-brainer, a great deal. I strongly recommend this watch.

I purchased this watch about three weeks ago and absolutely love it. There is nothing not to like about this watch. The packaging is nice and acceptable and doesn't look bad or cheap. The watch itself is beautiful. I was really taken by its solid look and feel. This watch is hand wound which is a big plus compared to most other automatic watches out there double or sometimes triple the price. The watch measures 40 mm across the dial( without the crown) The crown is a push-down which ensure its water resistance. The bezel on this watch is unidirectional and a little hard to turn and needs some getting used to. So far the time loss on this watch has been 4 - 5 seconds per day which is phenomenal. This is what one would expect from Rolex Submariner. I highly recommend this watch.

I like the way it feels and it's beautiful in your wrist..just like my Rolex watches.