Deliver to Belgium
IFor best experience Get the App
From Publishers Weekly With this work, Hughes, who teaches history at Ohio State, makes a major contribution to the history of tactical airpower in the U.S. Air Force. Quesada, like most of his pre-1941 contemporaries, was heavily exposed to the orthodoxies of strategic bombardment. His experience in the Mediterranean, however, convinced him that direct support of ground forces was at least as important. As commander of IX Fighter Command (later Tactical Air) from October 1943 to V-E Day, Quesada was instrumental in developing the doctrines and practices that made the role of the American fighter-bomber a decisive factor in the D-Day campaign. He was quickly sidetracked in a postwar Air Force emphasizing nuclear weapons rather than ground attack. But Quesada's legacy, argues Hughes, ignored in Vietnam, bore fruit in Desert Storm and continues to shape Air Force policies. Photos not seen by PW. Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc. Read more From Library Journal A key to the successful Allied invasion at Normandy was the effective and responsive use of air power. Here, Hughes (history, Ohio State Univ.) describes not only the tours of duty that made Gen. Pete Quesada a military leader?a story fascinating in its own right?but also sketches a vivid picture of the birth of this new military tactic. Hughes describes how Quesada's career in the army prepared him to become one of the best men for the job of developing and carrying out the new military tactic of close air support. He also explains the evolution of what would become in the modern era nothing less than the birth of the fledgling concept of combined arms. Direct communications, joint planning, and the use of liaison officers were refinements that had to be tested in smaller actions leading up to D-Day. A sweeping history told thoroughly, logically, and well, this book is of major importance to students of military tactics and World War II.?Mel D. Lane, Sacramento, Cal.Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc. Read more See all Editorial Reviews
D**D
Excellent look at one of the founders of close air support
Elwood Quesada was one of those nearly forgotten pioneers of tactical air power during World War II. With the Ninth Air Force, Quesada would develop the concept of close air support to levels very similar to how it is practiced even today. Two key innovations were the use of Microwave Early Warning (MEW) radar and the technology for "combat column cover". MEW radar was originally a field radar designed for defensive purposes, to warn of an enemy air attack. As German aircraft rapidly became scarce, the radar came to be used for air traffic control, to keep track of and direct fighter-bombers in the air to fresh targets in real time. The second innovation was to provide radios that could talk directly to the planes (a simple idea, which had never been done before!) in the tanks of the attacking columns. The combination of the two meant that U.S. Army units could call in close air support on top of an enemy position in minutes, a capability that no other army, including the British, had during World War II.As other reviewers have pointed out, the book does leave some holes in its treatment of the history of U.S. tactical air power. U.S. and British air power during WWII in general was not very good at destroying tanks - the available weapons (bombs and rockets) were simply too inaccurate. But it did have a tremendous effect on the Germans' ability to mount cohesive counterattacks and severely restricted their freedom of movement and destroyed their supplies.Also, although Quesada pioneered the main techniques for close air support during WWII, Gen. Otto Weyland of XIX TAC would become its greatest practitioner, working closely with Patton and the Third Army, and contributing tremendously to the success of the Third Army.Thus, two additional excellent books to read are "Air Power at the Battlefront" by Ian Gooderson and "Patton's Air Force" by David Spires. The first book gives a much more accurate look at Allied tactical air power, and the second points out that Patton's tremendous success was due in no small part to the contributions of Weyland's XIX TAC.Two other fascinating points in this biography of Elwood Quesada are his postwar battles with pretty boy Hoyt Vandenberg, and his marriage to Kate Putnam, heiress to the Pulitzer fortune.Vandenberg was appointed the head of the Ninth Air Force during WWII despite knowing nothing about tactical air power and later became the Chief of Staff for the new US Air Force. Vandenberg was the classic example of how far you can get in life if you look good, talk good, and play a great game of golf. He was also responsible for starting the USAAF's long slide away from having the proper equipment and weapons to do close air support the right way. Quesada was forced out of the Air Force by Vandenberg. Weyland would be exiled to non-combat jobs until the Korean War forced Vandenberg to bring him back as he now needed somebody who actually knew how to do tactical air support.Yes, they ended up naming that missile base outside of Santa Barbara after this dumbkin pretty boy, Vandenberg Air Force Base. Something I think about every time they test fire off one of those Minutemen missiles and I see the missile contrails in the sky (they can be quite colorful and beautiful). They should rename the base after somebody more deserving.Quesada's marriage to the widowed Kate Putnam allowed him to tap into the high society of the rich and famous. Which is why he could quit the Air Force whereas Weyland had to stay in and swallow his pride for several years. Quesada would go on to many different jobs and pursuits, none lasting more than three years or so.A fascinating story of a fascinating man during the critical birth period of the U.S. Air Force.
E**N
How tactical aviation won WW II
This book reveals much of the history of flight, the airmen that made the army air corp an important weapon to fight the Nazi's and the great man behind the the war effort. It is a fantastic read. Lt. General Pete Quesda is like a great composer. His gift of out of the box thinking leads the IX Tactical Air Command to shape the ground and air fighting. This is new in warfare. He astounds Omar Bradley, Hap Arnold, George Marshall, and Ike Eisenhower with his leadership. Only by reading this book can a layman understand greatness. Only by reading the book can one understand how commanders are not far removed from the men they command. His airmen become his sons, nephews .... He takes pride in their hard fight and gives them the credit for their achievements. Quesda character reveals a man who loves his country. He personifies integrity.
M**Y
Four Stars
Had good information.
A**R
This is a good read. Hughes accepts initial numbers for destroyed tanks ...
This is a good read. Hughes accepts initial numbers for destroyed tanks and other equipment at face value too often. After-action studies have clarified these numbers and that information should have been used. Also Mr. Hughes apparently has no clue that the eight .50 caliber machine guns on a P47 are not 50 mm canon.
B**R
Great Book
I had to read some of the book for class but it was good enough that I read the entire thing.
D**N
Four Stars
Fine book.
R**N
I was a pilot under General Quesada and have researched ...
I was a pilot under General Quesada and have researched and wrote about him. As CG he was an exceptional leader, a dedicated leader of tactical air power and certainly deserved to have been leader of the 9th (tactical) Air Force. That was denied him by the “bomber barons” who had placed their bets on the doctrine that carpet-bombing would bring the war to an end by destroying the enemy’s military capability and public support; doctrines that flat-out failed. General Hoyt Vandenburg, a dedicated Bomber Baron, was selected over General Quesada and when he became the U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff he awarded Pete a third star and appointed him head of the Tactical Air Force albeit with little money and few aircraft. General Quesada soon took early retirement, off to a new career as a successful career devoted to public service.My sole criticism of OVERLORD is that the author put canons in the P-47. Also, General Pete trusted his memory as I found several factorial errors in the transcript of his oral history on file at the Army War College.I was in contact with his shortly before he died and when he was legally blind.
R**L
A biography of tactical airpower
This book does a good job of covering a relatively neglected chapter in U.S. airpower history, the birth of U.S. tactical airpower. Although Quesada is the ostensible subject of the biography, tactical airpower itself also lies at the heart of the narrative. That the newly-independent U.S. Air Force marginalized both Quesada and his hard-won advances in tactical aviation in favor of strategic (nuclear) bombardment would be a great loss to U.S. airpower and would have disastrous consequences later on. Only toward the end of the Vietnam debacle would the U.S. military truly begin to appreciate the need for the neglected art of tactical aviation.
Trustpilot
3 days ago
1 week ago