The Bern Identity: A Search for Bernie Sanders and the New American Dream (Kindle Single) Kindle Edition

When someone endeavors to write a book about a brilliant, positive, productive reformer such as Bernie Sanders, the reader should by all rights be left feeling uplifted! I managed to read through the whole book! It was a waste of my time. This author seems to care more about himself than he does about his search. This book does not do Senator Sanders, or it's readers justice.

From the beginning of The Bern Identity, I was swept up in both the story of the author’s quest for the essential Bernie Sanders and the story of how young Bernard Sanders became the revolutionary leader we know today. Not many people realize that Bernie has more followers than Donald Trump (check the similar percentages of numerous Democrats for Sanders to less numerous Republicans for Trump). I have long been a Bernie fan, listening to his radio interviews on Thom Hartmann and other outlets and occasionally catching a speech on C-Span. I liked the way he spoke directly and clearly to the issues; of course it helped that I agreed with his policies. But this book told me so much more about Bernie that I had not known, such as his terrific improvements in Burlington, VT, when he was mayor—improvements that I still enjoy when I visit that part of Vermont. The gonzo writing style is not practiced today as much as it should be; this book should help reporters revive it. This is a great read for a low price. Anyone interested in the politics of 2016 should buy it.

Every time I write about a book about Bernie Sanders, somebody sends me a better one. If this keeps up, by the time his campaign is over I should be reading the best book ever written and be completely out of touch with reality. The latest is The Bern Identity by Will Bunch.These books don't make me like Bernie Sanders any more or less, or for that matter take seriously any more or less the idea that a likable personality is particularly relevant. But they do inform me about Sanders and about his supporters. Bunch's is the most substantive, best researched, and most coherent book of the bunch so far.Bunch admires Bernie for learning the lessons of the 1960s and, for the most part, never selling out. Bunch finds this remarkable, almost unique. And, of course, it is that among U.S. Senators, and among the gang of misfits occupying the two stages at the freak shows we call presidential primary debates. But there are many thousands of people who woke up during the 1960s and never went to sleep. Many of them have worked for peace and justice ever since with hardly a burnout. One could pick any number of them and stack their accomplishments up quite impressively against those of Bernie Sanders.Yes, I agree that Bernie's injecting of a little bit of sense into corporate television is important and very hard to measure. Yes, I have no doubt that there's a bit more integrity and relevance in Bernie's background than there was in the legend of the African-American community-organizing author come to save us while shrewdly pretending not to. But Bernie holding the biggest political rallies in some big cities since Eugene McCarthy may not be an unmixed blessing.I've written before about Bernie volunteers professing to be motivated by policies that their candidate explicitly opposes. Yet I cannot stay untouched by the excitement Bunch depicts at massive Bernie rallies he's attended. It's wonderful for people to suddenly discover that something might be possible, to suddenly give a damn, to suddenly do a tiny something about it. But it's also miserable to consider that they have been so well trained to do this only as cheerleaders for a candidate.Surely that's not the lesson of the 1960s in which the civil rights and antiwar and other movements organized around issues and imposed change on the entire bipartisan political structure -- just as major change has usually been brought about. Yes, elections were hugely important in the Sixties, but they were secondary. Now they are Everything. The peace movement shut down in 2007 because there was to be an election in 2008, and it won't start up again until a Republican moves into the White House. Elections are terrific -- I'd love to see a fair and open one in the United States some day -- but there is a danger in the new myth that they are all that there is.Bunch's book celebrates Bernie Sanders as having stayed true to his Sixties politics all these years, while the public moved away and has finally returned to him. I think there's something to that, but would offer a few caveats. First, there have always been millions of people wanting progressive policies, and they have been effectively shut out by the media, by the Democratic Party, and by an increasingly corrupted political system. Second, the other candidates have moved so far right that Bernie is closer to where a middle of the roader sits. Third, Bernie is fundamentally rightwing on militarism, and nobody wants to analyze that problem in any depth.On the first point, I recommend Ted Rall's book on Bernie, the first half of which is a history of the Democratic Party's flight to the right.On the second point, let's be honest, there are many people who could be doing more or less what Bernie is doing right now in the Democratic Primary. Most potential candidates sat this one out, either because Hillary Clinton claimed such a lock on the nomination or because committing to support her should she win was too revolting a decision to make in order to run as a Democrat. The media completely whites out third-party candidates like Jill Stein, and the public has been convinced they're useless. And yet, even as the Republicans ape Hitler and Mussolini, Hillary Clinton tries to position herself to their right. Bernie is a brilliant, dedicated, relatively honest candidate who has been given an opening by a combination of circumstances, not least of them perhaps the media's notion that an undecided primary is better for ratings as long as there's no risk of someone like Sanders actually winning.On the third point, Bunch's history of Sanders' life suggests that it's not entirely new for him to give far less interest to peace than to domestic matters. There's no account of Sanders growing outraged over the war on Vietnam, rather over President John Kennedy's opposition to the Cuban revolution. Sanders registered as a conscientious objector, but he organized against racial discrimination and against restrictions on having sex on campus. Bunch seems not to notice the elephant that's not in the room. He says a Sanders speech is a laundry list of liberal issues in which everyone will hear whatever they're waiting for. Not if you're waiting to hear about peace.Bunch doesn't hide the shortcomings. He notes that the Sanders campaign staff forced the removal of a banner advocating rights for Palestinians, that in 1983 peace activists protested a GE weapons plant in Burlington demanding conversion to peaceful manufacturing and Mayor Sanders had them arrested in the name of preserving 3,000 weapons-making jobs, and that in recent years Sanders has supported the production of the F-35 also in the name of jobs for Vermonters.In 1972 Sanders wrote, as Bunch quotes him, that the daily U.S. military budget was greater than the annual state budget of Vermont. At $4 billion today, the state of Vermont is slightly over one day's military spending (taking annual military spending to be $1.2 trillion) but it has been a long time since Sanders has demanded conversion to peaceful spending. Instead, he has accepted the truly sociopathic notion that jobs (and jobs of a particular sort, as if a good socialist doesn't know that the same dollars could produce more jobs if spent on peace) justify militarism. Imagine how that sounds to the 96% of humanity never mentioned by Sanders, except when citing the successes of European nations whose radically lower military spending he seems not to have noticed.Dear parent of dead children in Yemen just blown up by U.S. weapons, let me assure you that the money Saudi Arabia paid for those weapons -- if not the "contributions" to the Clinton family -- produced a lot of jobs. And while we could have had even more jobs by investing in something useful like green energy that would keep you from baking to death in the years to come, the fact is that I don't really give a damn.Militarism is at least half of what Congress spends money on each year. It's not my personal quirky interest. Is it OK that Bernie excuses Israel's crimes because he's Jewish? Should we overlook his support for guns because he's from Vermont? These are debatable, because he's so wonderful on so many other things. But continuing down the path of sociopathic militarism is not an option if we are to maintain a livable planet. Bernie voted against the 2003 attack on Iraq, but then worked against those in Congess trying to block funding for it. Was that the right compromise? Was that authenticity?Of course, the military spending debate is usually about the wars that add 10% or so to the standard military spending. When it comes to those, Sanders wants Saudi Arabia to start paying for them. But there are problems with that scheme. First, Saudi Arabia gets its money by selling the world the poisonous fossil fuels that will destroy it. Second, Saudi Arabia buys the biggest pile of its weapons from the United States, which thereby contributes to the mass slaughter -- and everyone knows it. Third, Saudi Arabia is one of the largest sources of funding and support for the people that Bernie imagines it funding a war against. Fourth, continuing these insane wars in the Middle East will continue to spread violence around and outside of that region, including to the United States, regardless of what share of the bill the United States is asking Saudi Arabia to pick up. That cycle of violence will only end by taking a different approach, not by continuing down the same road with a different billing scheme.The great hope that comes to the smarter people at rallies for good candidates under corrupt electoral systems is that they are building a movement that will outlast the campaign. But when has that actually happened? And how can such a candidate-focused movement not bow before the candidate's own compromises?The election book we really need is the one that explains the minor role elections play in social change. The next-best election book that we need, the one I keep looking for, is the one that outlines what each candidate proposes to do if elected. What would their proposed budgets look like? Which nations would they bomb first? Does Bernie think military spending is too high or too low? Who knows! I expect the question not to come up in the next dozen Bernie books, but I'll keep looking.

Bernie Sanders has a problem: He has a great story to tell about himself, but he seems constitutionally unwilling or unable to share it. He’s an issues guy in the age of the politics of personal narrative. So whenever he is pushed into talking about, say, his childhood in Brooklyn, or his early days in Vermont — well, you can see him gagging a bit. He hates that stuff.Which is one reason why Will Bunch’s “The Bern Identity” is such an important book. Bunch tells Bernie's story — from Sanders childhood in Brooklyn to his years at the University of Chicago to his early political defeats in Vermont — while also taking us on the 2016 campaign trail to hear Bernie on the stump and to meet some of Sanders' supporters.By cutting back and forth — from Bernie now to Bernie back then — Bunch sheds light on one of the most exciting elements of Bernie’s campaign: Sanders is a politician who has mostly stood still, ideologically speaking. What Bernie says today is not very different than what he was saying 30 years ago. Yet his ideas and ideals, which once may have seemed marginal or even extreme, are now drawing massive crowds around the country. History, which seemingly had left Bernie Sanders (I-VT) behind, has now doubled back to embrace him on a national stage. (Bernie isn't saying "I told you so" or "I've been warning you an economic meltdown was coming" ... but he could.)No one has done a better job of telling this story than Will Bunch in “The Bern Identity.” What I especially love about this ebook is that it’s available soon after Bunch completed his reporting, and weeks before the primaries begin. You can read it now while the drama continues to unfold.Which means this book almost feels like an interactive adventure. It's a story without a pre-ordained ending. A true tale that asks: Given this amazing backstory, what do you -- as a reader and a voter -- want to happen next? Because the outcome is ultimately in your hands.That sense of possibility and agency -- that each of us has a speaking part to play in our nation's political life -- it's a feeling I got when I read this book. Bunch draws you easily from page to page... and then back into the world. What happens next? Your call.This is political journalism at its very best.

A rather short narrative that captured my attention for a while.